Wow, this is getting around fast. Ben sent a link to this site to me on Thursday.
I can take 31, but I think this is wildly inaccurate. I don't think it takes into account the size differences of 5 year olds. I think that by using the smaller (light and boney) children as weapons, I would be able to take many more than 31.
I can take 17, and I was feeling pretty confident until I saw that other people commenting could take 24-31! I have no trouble fighting dirty with five year olds, even usuing them as human shields, but I don't have any training in martial arts or "swarm" combat.
This is actually kind of nice to think about, since I used to do fingersticks on children to test their hemoglobin, and some of them I would have liked to have had a chance to "take". Erin/Muse
17!! That's about 16 more than I expected. But I found that in the whole role-playing situation I wouldn't mind pile-driving the bastards or throwing them into one another as a really embarrassing (for them) weapon. -cK
I did take the plunge on the link and chose the 'me or them' route and was able to come up with 31. I like the choice on ethics "ehtics...I am to busy pile driving the little monsters back to kindergarten" or something of that sort. There have been days that I would have considered it...when around other peoples children of course....mine are always sweethearts.
24! i swear i am getting tougher!
ReplyDeleteWow, this is getting around fast. Ben sent a link to this site to me on Thursday.
ReplyDeleteI can take 31, but I think this is wildly inaccurate. I don't think it takes into account the size differences of 5 year olds. I think that by using the smaller (light and boney) children as weapons, I would be able to take many more than 31.
Big words, Joe. Were you willing to use children as weapons? Maybe that'd get you a couple more.
ReplyDeleteBen says hi. He's here this weekend. He'll be leaving for the Peace Corp in a couple weeks.
ReplyDeleteBen says he can only take 9 five year olds. He said that he would not be willing to use children as weapons or fight dirty.
I can take 17, and I was feeling pretty confident until I saw that other people commenting could take 24-31! I have no trouble fighting dirty with five year olds, even usuing them as human shields, but I don't have any training in martial arts or "swarm" combat.
ReplyDeleteThis is actually kind of nice to think about, since I used to do fingersticks on children to test their hemoglobin, and some of them I would have liked to have had a chance to "take".
Erin/Muse
17!! That's about 16 more than I expected. But I found that in the whole role-playing situation I wouldn't mind pile-driving the bastards or throwing them into one another as a really embarrassing (for them) weapon.
ReplyDelete-cK
Shit. Where's Dankert? He'd probably drop the MOAB on 'em.
ReplyDelete-Cheney
I did take the plunge on the link and chose the 'me or them' route and was able to come up with 31. I like the choice on ethics "ehtics...I am to busy pile driving the little monsters back to kindergarten" or something of that sort. There have been days that I would have considered it...when around other peoples children of course....mine are always sweethearts.
ReplyDeletesorry I didn't identify myself.
ReplyDeletebickett wuz here
Man, I gotta hit the gym or something. Everybody is doing more damage than me!
ReplyDelete